中国科学院文献情报中心机构知识库
Advanced  
NSL OpenIR  > Journal of Data and Information Science  > Journal of Data and Information Science-2016  > 期刊论文
Title: Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics
Author: Fred Y. Ye1; Mu-Hsuan Huang2; Dar-Zen Chen3
Source: Journal of Data and Information Science
Issued Date: 2016-06-17
Volume: 1, Issue:2, Pages:13-31
Keyword: Performance matrix ; Trace metrics ; h-index|h-core ; I3 ; Bibliometrics ; Patentometrics
Subject: 新闻学与传播学 ; 图书馆、情报与文献学
Indexed Type: 其他
DOI: 10.20309/jdis.201611
Corresponding Author: Dar-Zhen Chen (E-mail: dzchen@ntu.edu.tw).
DOC Type: Research Paper
Abstract:

Purpose: To comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of a group or an individual in both bibliometrics and patentometrics.
Design/methodology/approach: Trace metrics were applied to the top 30 universities in the 2014 Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) — computer sciences, the top 30 ESI highly cited papers in the computer sciences field in 2014, as well as the top 30 assignees and the top 30 most cited patents in the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) computer hardware and software category.
Findings: We found that, by applying trace metrics, the research or marketing impact efficiency, at both group and individual levels, was clearly observed. Furthermore, trace metrics were more sensitive to the different publication-citation distributions than the average citation and h-index were.
Research limitations: Trace metrics considered publications with zero citations as negative contributions. One should clarify how he/she evaluates a zero-citation paper or patent before applying trace metrics.
Practical implications: Decision makers could regularly examinine the performance of their university/company by applying trace metrics and adjust their policies accordingly.
Originality/value: Trace metrics could be applied both in bibliometrics and patentometrics and provide a comprehensive view. Moreover, the high sensitivity and unique impact efficiency view provided by trace metrics can facilitate decision makers in examining and adjusting their policies.

English Abstract:

Purpose: To comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of a group or an individual in both bibliometrics and patentometrics.
Design/methodology/approach: Trace metrics were applied to the top 30 universities in the 2014 Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) — computer sciences, the top 30 ESI highly cited papers in the computer sciences field in 2014, as well as the top 30 assignees and the top 30 most cited patents in the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) computer hardware and software category.
Findings: We found that, by applying trace metrics, the research or marketing impact efficiency, at both group and individual levels, was clearly observed. Furthermore, trace metrics were more sensitive to the different publication-citation distributions than the average citation and h-index were.
Research limitations: Trace metrics considered publications with zero citations as negative contributions. One should clarify how he/she evaluates a zero-citation paper or patent before applying trace metrics.
Practical implications: Decision makers could regularly examinine the performance of their university/company by applying trace metrics and adjust their policies accordingly.
Originality/value: Trace metrics could be applied both in bibliometrics and patentometrics and provide a comprehensive view. Moreover, the high sensitivity and unique impact efficiency view provided by trace metrics can facilitate decision makers in examining and adjusting their policies.

Project Number: Grant No.: 71173187
Project: the National Natural Science Foundation of China ; Jiangsu Key Laboratory Fund for financial support
Funder: Ms. Danqi Shen ; Ms. Helen F. Xue ; Ms. Mei-Chun Lin
Related URLs: 查看原文
Language: 英语
Citation statistics:
Content Type: 期刊论文
URI: http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/8595
Appears in Collections:Journal of Data and Information Science_Journal of Data and Information Science-2016 _期刊论文

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
20160203.pdf(3336KB)期刊论文出版稿开放获取View Download

description.institution: 1.School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
2.Department of Library and Information Science, Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, China
3.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Institute of Industrial Engineering, Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, China

Recommended Citation:
Fred Y. Ye,Mu-Hsuan Huang,Dar-Zen Chen. Comparative Study of Trace Metrics between Bibliometrics and Patentometrics[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science,2016,1(2):13-31.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Fred Y. Ye]'s Articles
[Mu-Hsuan Huang]'s Articles
[Dar-Zen Chen]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Fred Y. Ye]‘s Articles
[Mu-Hsuan Huang]‘s Articles
[Dar-Zen Chen]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit
文件名: 20160203.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 
评注功能仅针对注册用户开放,请您登录
您对该条目有什么异议,请填写以下表单,管理员会尽快联系您。
内 容:
Email:  *
单位:
验证码:   刷新
您在IR的使用过程中有什么好的想法或者建议可以反馈给我们。
标 题:
 *
内 容:
Email:  *
验证码:   刷新

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  中国科学院文献情报中心 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace