中国科学院文献情报中心机构知识库
Advanced  
NSL OpenIR  > Journal of Data and Information Science  > Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science-2013  > 期刊论文
Title: Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League
Author: Shu Fang(方曙) ; Hai-yun Xu(许海云) ; YUE Zenghui ; LI Hongpei ; Qi, Yan(齐燕) ; Lei, BingXu(雷炳旭)
Source: Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science
Issued Date: 2013-12-25
Volume: 6, Issue:4, Pages:79-96
Keyword: Discipline evaluation ; University evaluation ; Scientific assessment ; Evaluation index
Subject: 编辑出版
Corresponding Author: Xu Haiyun (E-mail:xuhy@clas.ac.cn)
Abstract:
Purpose: Based on the case of the top nine elite universities in China (i.e. C9 League), we evaluate the university discipline advantages in terms of outputs and influence of scientific articles. Combining with the discipline collaboration analysis, we provide suggestions on discipline development and future collaboration for C9 League members.

Design/methodology/approach: First, we carry out a correlation analysis. Then, we obtain the new combination evaluation indicators through factor analysis on seven primary indicators from InCite platform. Afterwards, we assign the weighted values to different indicators in order to get the evaluation scores and the ranking for each C9 League member. Then, we obtain the bibliographic data of the C9 League members for extracting the category classifications from the Web and transforming them into Degree-Granting and Personal Trainning Courses Catalogue (DPTCC). According to the original collaboration frequencies among C9 League members, we carry out the analysis on two-mode collaboration networks. Finally, we propose some suggestions on the future collaboration and development.

Findings: There is correlation relationship between the outputs of scientific papers and influence indicators, so it is necessary to use the various indicators to acquire the more scientific evaluation. Meanwhile, league members are different in the discipline development level, and have inadequate collaboration with each other, which indicates that there exists the great potential for further collaborations.

Research limitations: Despite the relative high quality SCI papers, preference for different disciplines of SCI and different discipline features for C9 members probably exert negative influence on evaluation results.

Practical implications: We provide a research thought and an operational approach to the disciplines evaluation, which would promote more methods for scientific discipline evaluation and reasonable management for universities.

Originality/value: There are more and more articles on the universities evaluation indexes, but rarely on the relationship among the indicators. Therefore, our approach would be helpful for the evaluation of university disciplines.
English Abstract:
Purpose: Based on the case of the top nine elite universities in China (i.e. C9 League), we evaluate the university discipline advantages in terms of outputs and influence of scientific articles. Combining with the discipline collaboration analysis, we provide suggestions on discipline development and future collaboration for C9 League members.

Design/methodology/approach: First, we carry out a correlation analysis. Then, we obtain the new combination evaluation indicators through factor analysis on seven primary indicators from InCite platform. Afterwards, we assign the weighted values to different indicators in order to get the evaluation scores and the ranking for each C9 League member. Then, we obtain the bibliographic data of the C9 League members for extracting the category classifications from the Web and transforming them into Degree-Granting and Personal Trainning Courses Catalogue (DPTCC). According to the original collaboration frequencies among C9 League members, we carry out the analysis on two-mode collaboration networks. Finally, we propose some suggestions on the future collaboration and development.

Findings: There is correlation relationship between the outputs of scientific papers and influence indicators, so it is necessary to use the various indicators to acquire the more scientific evaluation. Meanwhile, league members are different in the discipline development level, and have inadequate collaboration with each other, which indicates that there exists the great potential for further collaborations.

Research limitations: Despite the relative high quality SCI papers, preference for different disciplines of SCI and different discipline features for C9 members probably exert negative influence on evaluation results.

Practical implications: We provide a research thought and an operational approach to the disciplines evaluation, which would promote more methods for scientific discipline evaluation and reasonable management for universities.

Originality/value: There are more and more articles on the universities evaluation indexes, but rarely on the relationship among the indicators. Therefore, our approach would be helpful for the evaluation of university disciplines.
Related URLs: 查看原文
Content Type: 期刊论文
URI: http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/6708
Appears in Collections:Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science-2013_期刊论文

Files in This Item: Download All
File Name/ File Size Content Type Version Access License
Shu FANG.pdf(5076KB)----开放获取
View Download

Recommended Citation:
FANG Shu,XU Haiyun,YUE Zenghui,et al. Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League[J]. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science,2013,6(4):79-96.
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[FANG Shu]'s Articles
[XU Haiyun]'s Articles
[YUE Zenghui]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[FANG Shu]‘s Articles
[XU Haiyun]‘s Articles
[YUE Zenghui]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit
文件名: Shu FANG.pdf
格式: Adobe PDF
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 
评注功能仅针对注册用户开放,请您登录
您对该条目有什么异议,请填写以下表单,管理员会尽快联系您。
内 容:
Email:  *
单位:
验证码:   刷新
您在IR的使用过程中有什么好的想法或者建议可以反馈给我们。
标 题:
 *
内 容:
Email:  *
验证码:   刷新

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

 

Valid XHTML 1.0!
Copyright © 2007-2017  中国科学院文献情报中心 - Feedback
Powered by CSpace