Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League
FANG Shu; XU Haiyun; YUE Zenghui; LI Hongpei; QI Yan; LEI Bingxu; Xu Haiyun (E-mail:xuhy@clas.ac.cn)
2013-12-25
发表期刊Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science
ISSN1674-3393
卷号6期号:4页码:79-96
摘要
Purpose: Based on the case of the top nine elite universities in China (i.e. C9 League), we evaluate the university discipline advantages in terms of outputs and influence of scientific articles. Combining with the discipline collaboration analysis, we provide suggestions on discipline development and future collaboration for C9 League members.

Design/methodology/approach: First, we carry out a correlation analysis. Then, we obtain the new combination evaluation indicators through factor analysis on seven primary indicators from InCite platform. Afterwards, we assign the weighted values to different indicators in order to get the evaluation scores and the ranking for each C9 League member. Then, we obtain the bibliographic data of the C9 League members for extracting the category classifications from the Web and transforming them into Degree-Granting and Personal Trainning Courses Catalogue (DPTCC). According to the original collaboration frequencies among C9 League members, we carry out the analysis on two-mode collaboration networks. Finally, we propose some suggestions on the future collaboration and development.

Findings: There is correlation relationship between the outputs of scientific papers and influence indicators, so it is necessary to use the various indicators to acquire the more scientific evaluation. Meanwhile, league members are different in the discipline development level, and have inadequate collaboration with each other, which indicates that there exists the great potential for further collaborations.

Research limitations: Despite the relative high quality SCI papers, preference for different disciplines of SCI and different discipline features for C9 members probably exert negative influence on evaluation results.

Practical implications: We provide a research thought and an operational approach to the disciplines evaluation, which would promote more methods for scientific discipline evaluation and reasonable management for universities.

Originality/value: There are more and more articles on the universities evaluation indexes, but rarely on the relationship among the indicators. Therefore, our approach would be helpful for the evaluation of university disciplines.
;
Purpose: Based on the case of the top nine elite universities in China (i.e. C9 League), we evaluate the university discipline advantages in terms of outputs and influence of scientific articles. Combining with the discipline collaboration analysis, we provide suggestions on discipline development and future collaboration for C9 League members.

Design/methodology/approach: First, we carry out a correlation analysis. Then, we obtain the new combination evaluation indicators through factor analysis on seven primary indicators from InCite platform. Afterwards, we assign the weighted values to different indicators in order to get the evaluation scores and the ranking for each C9 League member. Then, we obtain the bibliographic data of the C9 League members for extracting the category classifications from the Web and transforming them into Degree-Granting and Personal Trainning Courses Catalogue (DPTCC). According to the original collaboration frequencies among C9 League members, we carry out the analysis on two-mode collaboration networks. Finally, we propose some suggestions on the future collaboration and development.

Findings: There is correlation relationship between the outputs of scientific papers and influence indicators, so it is necessary to use the various indicators to acquire the more scientific evaluation. Meanwhile, league members are different in the discipline development level, and have inadequate collaboration with each other, which indicates that there exists the great potential for further collaborations.

Research limitations: Despite the relative high quality SCI papers, preference for different disciplines of SCI and different discipline features for C9 members probably exert negative influence on evaluation results.

Practical implications: We provide a research thought and an operational approach to the disciplines evaluation, which would promote more methods for scientific discipline evaluation and reasonable management for universities.

Originality/value: There are more and more articles on the universities evaluation indexes, but rarely on the relationship among the indicators. Therefore, our approach would be helpful for the evaluation of university disciplines.
关键词Discipline Evaluation University Evaluation Scientific Assessment Evaluation Index
学科领域编辑出版
URL查看原文
项目资助者This work is supported by the West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Science (Grant No.Y4C0011001)
文献类型期刊论文
条目标识符http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/6708
专题Journal of Data and Information Science_Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science-2013
通讯作者Xu Haiyun (E-mail:xuhy@clas.ac.cn)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
FANG Shu,XU Haiyun,YUE Zenghui,et al. Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League[J]. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science,2013,6(4):79-96.
APA FANG Shu.,XU Haiyun.,YUE Zenghui.,LI Hongpei.,QI Yan.,...&Xu Haiyun .(2013).Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League.Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science,6(4),79-96.
MLA FANG Shu,et al."Empirical research of advantage disciplines of C9 League".Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science 6.4(2013):79-96.
条目包含的文件
文件名称/大小 文献类型 版本类型 开放类型 使用许可
Shu FANG.pdf(5076KB) 开放获取请求全文
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
谷歌学术
谷歌学术中相似的文章
[FANG Shu]的文章
[XU Haiyun]的文章
[YUE Zenghui]的文章
百度学术
百度学术中相似的文章
[FANG Shu]的文章
[XU Haiyun]的文章
[YUE Zenghui]的文章
必应学术
必应学术中相似的文章
[FANG Shu]的文章
[XU Haiyun]的文章
[YUE Zenghui]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。